US Cryptocurrency Exchanges Move at Different Speeds
Earlier in March Coinbase announced to trader’s glee that it would soon add support for ERC20 tokens. Fast forward 6-months, to the day, and the regulatory conscientious exchange announced that it has, rather, revamped its listing process, opening up a corridor for token creators to apply for possible addition onto their popular platform. Meanwhile, Circle and Kraken have added new assets. And with the Circle backed USD-C Stablecoin going live last week, Coinbase could find itself on the back foot against their very own vision of an ‘Open Financial System’ with their competitors cementing first-to-market partnerships across the decentralized ecosystem.
While Coinbase’s executive hiring bonanza has shown no sign of slow down this year, the same can’t be said about the exchange winning over new traders (Diar, 23 August & 23 April).
Before the cryptocurrency bear market this year, any slight rumor of a potential Coinbase add would cause an asset price surge – a “feature” the exchange earned from its popularity, but, whose gas may soon start to fizzle out to other exchanges adding new assets.
Coinbase’s only addition this year, Ethereum Classic, was met with lackluster reception from the crypto community as it wasn’t an ERC20 token, and was seen to be the inner workings of Digital Currency Group’s Barry Silbert whose investment arm Grayscale sponsor the development of the project (Diar, 16 July).
But it’s clear that Coinbase is attempting serious maneuvers in conveying, as of last week at the very least, that they do indeed plan to add more cryptocurrencies. The exchange has added a cryptocurrency ranking board, an educational platform, and have also released a mini-version of the Coinbase Index Fund were traders can bundle the assets currently listed.
Still, the new bells and whistles added to Coinbase’s own utopia falls short of the announcement made back in July which revealed that the exchange was exploring 5 potential additions - 0x, ZCash, Basic Attention Token, Cardano and Stellar Lumens (Diar, 16 July).
As it stands, at least from a regulatory point of view, Cardano, ZCash, and Stellar Lumens have all been added by US exchanges who also have fiat onboarding (see table). The latter two cryptocurrency have already received the blessings of the New York Department of Financial Services (Diar, 25 June).
While the ‘Big Apple’ may not be the center of the cryptocurrency world, the addition of ZCash and Stellar Lumens would still be compliant with the New York BitLicense with Gemini and itBit having set the precedent.
|| STABLECOIN TRICK?
Stablecoin projects have been structured as standalone projects, however, the depth of their adoption within the cryptocurrency ecosystem appear to be of strategic importance for exchanges. With various Stablecoin projects having popped up this year, many exchanges are hoping that the horse they’re backing a winner (Diar, 17 September).
And Stablecoin bring a good little trick for fiat on-ramps who are weary of regulators scrutinizing their listings as possible securities.
USDC Moves on Coinbase's 'Open Financial System' Vision?
Coinbase Falls Behind Other US Exchange Listed Assets
Notes: # Addition confirmed. Selected Exchanges have Fiat on-ramp
With Stablecoin being able to move between exchanges, access to lots of various cryptocurrencies becomes a reality, despite the user experience suffering from some extra steps.
|| CIRCLES…..OPEN FINANCIAL SYSTEM
It's no little wonder that investors have poured in over a quarter billion dollars into Stablecoin projects (Diar, 25 June). A non volatile Stablecoin could be the key for users to access decentralized financial services such as loans.
And as Coinbase continues to address their wish for an “Open Financial System”, they now face pressure from their competitors who have made advances on several fronts of the vision with reputable projects adopting Circle backed Stablecoin USDC. (see table).
Stablecoin Selection Advance on Exchanges, Decentralized Exchanges
Stablecoin Selection Advance on Exchanges, Decentralized Exchanges
Venture Capital Firms Go Deep and Wide with Blockchain Investments
While the billions being poured into Initial Coin Offerings stole headlines, traditional venture capital has also been backing companies covering a large spectrum of the blockchain ecosystem.
Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) were supposed to disrupt how early ventures raise capital. And many were calling for the end of venture capital as we know it. But markets have corrected, and token values have continued to plummet. As Diar found, 70% of tokens are now valued at less than what was raised during their ICO (Diar, 24 September 24). The majority of tokens have dropped in price by more than 90% from their all time highs.
Non-equity ICOs are not only scrutinized by the regulators but the founders also have very misaligned incentives as there is no contractual obligation to deliver a product - a reality that to date seems to be the case with few launches, and even less adoption. The amount that was raised through ICOs as well as the number of projects successfully completing an ICO is now approaching a one year low.
But one would certainly be too quick to call this the end of companies focusing on blockchain and cryptocurrencies.
Diar found that while projects are now more reluctant to raise capital through ICOs, traditional venture capital continues to up their risk in the Blockchain space. According to data provided by Pitchbook, in just the three quarters of 2018, blockchain and crypto companies have raised nearly 3.9Bn through traditional VC - 280% more when compared to last year (see chart). The number of deals also nearly doubled from last year. And investors are not only writing more checks, they are also writing much larger checks. The median deal size of crypto and blockchain investments has increased by more than $1Mn in 2018.
Ten of the largest deals in 2018 have seen blockchain and crypto companies raise more than $1.3Bn (see table) in venture capital. Only one of these companies has a native utility token - DFINITY. The rest presents a traditional equity investment.
Unsurprisingly, by far the most active VC investor is Barry Silbert’s Digital Currency Group (DCG). According to Pitchbook, the firm has closed more than 110 deals in the crypto and blockchain space. DCG is followed by Blockchain Capital and Pantera Capital who have closed 100 deals combined. The most active traditional VC firms are Andreessen Horowitz, Danhua Capital and Future Perfect Ventures (see table). The most active angels are Tim Draper, Naval Ravikant, Roger Ver and Barry Silbert.
There are close to 2,000 investors who have invested in at least one blockchain company. Diar analyzed the 50 most active investors, which have invested into at least 8 blockchain companies. Approximately 52% of investments are by investors who are not exclusively focused on investing in blockchain. And as far as location, the US is by and far leading the chart. Investors taking a punt into blockchain companies are predominantly based in the U.S. (79%), followed by China (12%), South Korea (2%) and Singapore (2%).
Largest 2018 Venture Capital Deals
Venture Capital Firms Blockchain Investments Still on the Rise
Venture Capital Median Blockchain Investment
Cryptocurrency Operations Manoeuvre to Launch "Blockchain Banks"
Securing banking facilities for cryptocurrency operations remains to be the "secret sauce." While Europe seems to be playing nicer with crypto than the US, others have seen an opportunity to build new banking operations from the ground up with a Blockchain focus to facilitate the sidelined industry.
Last week, a Switzerland-based startup SEBA, announced that it raised 100Mn CHF ($101.6Mn) in venture capital to build a bank that will give customers access to both fiat and crypto within the same account. The disclosed investors backing the project include Moscow-based Black River Ventures and Amsterdam-based Summer Capital.
The company, which currently employs 17 people, certainly doesn’t lack banking experience. SEBA will be headed by Guido Buehler who reached executive ranks throughout his 11-year tenure at UBS. SEBA’s chairman Andreas Amschwand as well as CTO Per Magnusson also worked at UBS for an extended time. Philipp Baretta, SEBA's CFO, had executive roles at both Credit Suisse and Citigroup.
SEBA is now in process of applying for a banking license from Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), with whom it has been in talks since April. After it receives the required approvals, the company plans to eventually expand to Singapore and the European Union.
In July, Binance invested $7.75Mn to purchase a 5% stake in Founders Bank. The new outfit applied for a banking license in Malta and plans to launch in the first half of 2019. The firm will hold an Equity Token Offering through Neufund towards the end of 2018.
|| BUT THATS NOT ALL FOLKS
The Litecoin Foundation partnered with TokenPay to acquire a nearly 20% stake in a German bank WEG Bank. The intention of the acquisition was to have a bank that is cryptocurrency friendly.
Banks Accepting Cryptocurrency Operations
|| BIG RISK, BIG REWARD?
Outside of Barclays UK who banks Coinbase, only smaller outfits look to have taken on the risk of cryptocurrencies. Diar places only four banks in the United States willing to facilitate cryptocurrency operations - Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Silvergate Bank, Cross River Bank and Signature Bank (Diar, 11 June).
Hypothekarbank Lenzburg, LHV Pank and Fidor Bank provide banking services to cryptocurrency businesses in Europe. And Vontobel, Falcon Private Bank and Bank Frick provide additional cryptocurrency based services such as asset management, trading, cold storage, tracker certificates and futures, even initial coin offering (ICO) advisory.
ICOs Tumble to $180Mn in September 2018, Just 7% of Peak
ICO - ETH Raise
Receive Diar Every Monday – The Digital Assets & Regulation Trade Publication
Disclaimer: Unless otherwise specified, the content of the articles published on www.diar.co constitutes intellectual property of Diar Ltd and may not be reproduced or republished in whole or in part without prior written consent. The information contained in the articles published on www.diar.co does not in any way constitute financial or investor advice and is only intended for informative purposes. Readers may not rely on such information to decide on investment or financing options or otherwise rely on such information in making decisions with monetary or financial effects. Diar Ltd does not accept any liability of any kind with regards to the validity of the information or with regards to any damage suffered as a result of reliance on such information. © 2018 Diar Ltd. Contact: email@example.com